The case came about when the asseverate Planned Parenthood League opened a clinic in New Haven, Connecticut, in 1961, two staff members, Estelle Griswold and C. Lee Buxton, were arrested and fined chthonian a rarely used law for giving advice and a prescription[->0] for a contraceptive[->1] to a married couple. The defendant argued that she had a organic right to concealment that was violated by enforcement of the 1879 state law. (Ivers, p.33) A legal team lead by Thomas Emerson represented Griswold and Buxton in this case. Emerson argued that the liberty part of the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was too broad to encompass the right to privacy that allowed married couples to get information and use birth control. The speak to struck down the Connecticut law saying that it violated the right of privacy protected by the US Constitution. (Ivers, p.
33) harmonize to the 53-32 of the General Statutes of Connecticut provided that both person who uses any drug, healthful article or instrument for the purpose of preventing conception shall be fined not less than fifty dollars or imprisoned not less than sixty days nor more than one course or be both fined and imprisoned. and 54-196 of the General Statutes of Connecticut states Any person who assists, abets, counsels, causes, hires or commands another to commit any curse may be prosecuted and punished as if he were the leading offender. When I carefully looked over this case, my argument on this is that Connecticut shouldnt had such law. The law clearly does violates the rights of the persons privacy correspond to the Fourteenth Amendment of the constitution. The question is why did the lawmakers make such a law knowing that it would violate the amendment? Married...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.