Comparing Functional Theorists

Running Head : COMPARING operable THEORISTSA Comparative comp repeal of Functional Theorists andHow Their Theories Relate to Modern Society[Author][Professor][University][Class]A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FUNCTIONAL THEORISTS AND HOW THEIR THEORIES RELATE TO MODERN SOCIETYThink of ordination as a nutrition being in which each exposit of the organism contri merelyes to its excerption . This view is the functionalist horizon , which emphasizes the way that move of a society are structured to maintain its stability . Charles Darwin first assay to use concepts from the inherent biological world to explain evolutionary changes in society . August Comte and Herbert Spencer argued that society is similar to a living organism in that both have peculiar(prenominal) needs that must be met to survive . Various parts of a social system , like those of biological organism , generally function to lighther in an ly manner , thence producing the well-being of the whole . Hence functionalism is theorized as a natural tendency of social systems to strive for equilibrium with each part contributing to that stabilityThe first part of the provides a brief books review on some sociologists and researcher s view on functionalism . This is done so as to provide an understanding of functionalism before going through the views of the major sociologists included here . The relaxation method of this is dedicated to giving a deeper look at the functionalist perspective by not just simply stating its definition and examples but also examining and criticizing the views of some major sociologists - Ymile Durkheim Talcott Parsons , and Niklas Luhmann - on functionalism which may or may not be similar . At the end of the , a comparison and contrast on the theories take placen by these sociologists is discussed . Finally , the author provides an application of the functionalist perspective to modern societyLiterature ReviewIn the join States , noted functionalists such as Davis and Moore (1945 ) have applied functionalism to the sphere of stratification in American as well as other societies .

Rather than emphasize evaluation processes , Davis and Moore were interested in the principles of a functional theory of social stratification . Underlining the requirement of stratificatioin for organized social existence they stated , As a functioning mechanism a society must in some manner distribute its members in social arranges and induce them to perform the duties of these positions (Davis and Moore , 1945 ,. 244 . all the same , in for social positions to be filled , incentives must be available to individuals Davis and Moore also suggested that social positions are not agree due to the duties and responsibilities to these positions Similarly , the importance of the position , a psyche s ability to meet the position requirements , and the degree of enjoyment derived from the position all play a part in determine a stratified system of social positions . Hence , the rewards and their diffusion become a part of the social and thus give rise to stratification (Davis and Moore , 1945 ,. 245Davis and Moore examined three incentives or rewards : material goods superciliousness , and pride . The result was a system of inequality...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .