During this essay I will explore the logical implication of how Steinbeck presents Curlys wife through the connotations of her name, how she is first shown, her parallels with other characters and finally how she is presented when she has died .
Curlys wife, unless a name yet a symbol of how women were whence regarded by their husbands, as a possession, a belonging have only by men.
When Curleys wife married him she became his, everything she owned became his, Steinbeck could be emphasising this authority and power by having Curly even dart her name, so she no longer has her own name but now everyone associates Curley with her, she is no longer her own person.
The use of a possessive apostrophe emphasises the point even further that she belongs to him and he controls her, although she can try to push the boundaries of societys rules and expectations, he will always be there to stop her as she is dominated by him. practically like many women in 1930s America who had a lack of importance as they were male dominated.
Women held little respect during this era, they had no choice, no voice and no right to vote, they were categorised on with the insane and children. In the novel she says They left the weak behind. She was talking about Crooks, Lennie, and Candy, who were...If you want to get a full essay, dictate it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.